Plagiarism
by Jim Lengel, Dean of Faculty, Benjamin Franklin Institute of Technology, Boston (http://www.bu.edu/jlengel and http://www.lengel.net)
Many teachers feel that the arrival of the Internet into homes and
schools has made plagiarism easier. And they are right. Copying and
pasting text from a web page to a class paper is much easier than
copying paragraphs longhand from the encyclopedia. And the resources
available for copying online are so much larger and wide-ranging than
the books in the library that the chances of being caught are much
less -- there's no way that the teacher can be familiar with billions
of web pages. The Internet has enabled a new closet industry of
school paper-peddlers who
provide students, for a fee, ready-written papers on a variety of the
most common assignment topics. These crafty businesses prey on high
school and college students through email advertising and other
high-tech market channels that contribute to an atmosphere that makes
plagiarism seem acceptable.
What should be done?
Many educators have fought this trend by restricting the
use of technology and online sources in student work. For example:
"Your paper on current events in Africa must list at
least five sources, only one of which may be from the Iinternet,"
explains Mrs. Martin. "That's to discourage you from just copying and
pasting. I want you to use library books, periodicals, and
interviews."
"Next week I will collect your note cards for the
research paper you are working on. I want to make sure this is your
own work, so the notes must be handwritten on standard 3x5 cards,
with a full bibliographic citation of the source on the back of each
card."
"The English department maintains an online database
containing all the short stories submitted by students over the last
five years. To discourage plagiarism, all of this year's stories from
students will be matched against this database."
Others have employed companies like TurnItIn to examine every student
paper for evidence of copying. For a fee, this company will compare
each paper against its huge database of text, looking for literary
immorality. This may
not be the best way to deal with the perennial problem of
plagiarism in the newly-arrived digital age. But many teachers, whose
students seem to be able to manipulate the megabytes much better than
they, know of no other way to combat their fear of computer-assisted
cheating.
Plagiarism is wrong. It's lazy, dishonest, immoral, and in some
cases illegal; it prevents learning and spreads guilt and distrust.
Yet many students are tempted by it, and in the midst of the
pressures to succeed in school succumb to its easy solutions. Are
there ways to discourage plagiarism without denying our students the
benefit of the online information revolution?
Here are a few suggestions:
Unique assignments
It's easy for students to find already-written papers on
stereotypical general topics. A quick look at the Research Papers Online site, for
instance, finds these titles listed under the history department:
- The British Industrial Revolution with Emphasis on Child
Labor
(6 Pages) $29.70
- The Political Career of Daniel Webster
(13 Pages) $64.35
- The Rape of Nanking
, (4 Pages) $19.80
- Italy: Its Social, Economic, Political and Historical
Background
, (4 Pages) $19.80
Topics like this, that have been the subject of assignments in
many classes in many locales over many years, make plagiarism easy.
Their bland nature fails to promote student interest, and their ready
availability online encourages copying. Perhaps a better way to frame
your students' study of these same topics is with a unique assignment
for which copying and pasting would be virtually impossible, such
as:
- Write a description of a day in the life in a British textile
factory in 1840, from the point of view of a 12-year old child
worker, in the first person.
- Read the front page of this morning's newspaper. Describe how
Daniel Webster would react to each story, and cite your sources for
his reactions.
- Compare the Rape of Nanking with the recent American assault on
Falluja.
- If the Italian hero Garibaldi were teaching Italian history in a
high school in Rome today, how would he summarize his country's
economy and history?
Not only are these approaches to the same topics more likely to
elicit creative thought and varied researches on the part of
students, they are also relatively immune to the influences of the
paper-peddlers and less susceptible to copying and pasting.
Process as well as product
One way to discourage instant online plagiarism is to
monitor and grade the process of developing the paper as
much as the paper itself. Require a planning outline, and grade it.
Call for notes to be turned in (in whatever form -- see the article
on writing
a paperless paper in this series), and comment on them. Have
students discuss their first drafts with their peers. Compare the
draft to the original outline. Comment on the draft and expect
revisions. Ask students to explain the source of the ideas in each
paragraph. By monitoring the process like this, you make plagiarism
very difficult, and encourage good study habits.
Catch it and check it
Learn to recognize plagiarism and know how to test your
suspicions. When you read a paragraph that doesn't seem to be in the
student's own words, select a sentence or two from it. Then copy the
selection. Now go to your web browser, and call up Google. Paste the selection into
the search field. If you find a web page containing the suspect text,
or something very close to it, you may have found the source of the
unexpected phrases. Once your students know that you can do this,
they are less likely to practice the most common form of
copy-and-paste plagiarism.
To learn more
Cut-and-Paste
Plagiarism: Preventing, Detecting and Tracking Online
Plagiarism, by Lisa Hinchliffe
Plagiarism, by
Sharon Stoerger
Deterring
& Detecting Online Plagiarism, from the North Harris College
Library
View Teaching with Technology Archive

|